HORRENDOUS CRIMES! GET OFF LIGHT
The savagery of the Murder and Rape of 21 year old British Backpacker Katherine Horton in Lamai Beach Koh Samui Thailand .
A small seaside village, I know only to well, as I lived there for many years.
I feel, I should spell out to the British Public and also the British Government, THE TRUTH behind the punishment of those criminals who are sentenced for the most savage of crimes in Thailand .
Firstly, I offer my sincere condolences to all the family and friends of Katherine Horton. I have first hand experience of how Thailand ’s punishment or sentences from the courts of Thailand actually break down into number of years served in prison, by a prisoner for their crime.
I’ am currently serving a 33 ½ year sentence in Bangkwang Prison Nonthaburi Thailand , where Katherine’s murderers are also held. Thailand has no real functional parole system for prisoners and apart from a kings Pardon, only amnesties given by the King or Queen of Thailand can reduce a prisoner’s sentence. Yet, for some reason amnesties here in Thailand severely discriminate against even the smallest of narcotics cases and favor the most savage of murderers, as in the case of Katherine.
Let’s look at how many amnesties were administered over the last 10 years here in Thailand .
Comparing what actual reductions in amnesties were given to 2 prisoners. These are based TRUE FACTS!
PRISONER A was convicted and sentenced to 50years imprisonment for a savage Murder and Rape, in fact he could have been convicted and sentenced on any of the following Horrendous crimes:- child molester and killer, serial killer, arsonist. As long as the crime doesn’t involve narcotics, it could be any number of horrendous crimes. All of which would have benefited to the extend I will show in all the last amnesties.
PRISONER B was convicted and sentenced to 50 years imprisonment for possession of 20 grams of narcotics. But because his case involves narcotics, it doesn’t matter how small or large the amount of narcotics.
All narcotics cases are very often excluded altogether from any of the amnesties given, or a fraction of the amnesty that is given to a murderer is given to a narcotic case.
The following amnesties are actual events and are calculated on, both prisoners A and B being of excellent classification (roll model prisoner), and both being sentenced and their cases being closed (finished in 1996).
1996 AMNESTY
PRISONER A would have received a half cut in sentence. 25 years off his sentence, leaving him a total now of 25 years to serve.
PRISONER B would have received one fifth cut in sentence 10 years off his sentence, leaving him a total now of 40 years to serve
1999 AMNESTY
All new murder cases etc. did receive a half cut in sentence this year. But old cases who already received a half cut in amnesty in 1996 only received one sixth.
PRISONER A received one sixth cut in sentence.4 years 2 months off his sentence, leaving him a total now of 21 years 10 months to serve.
PRISONER B this year received no amnesty at all! Because all narcotics cases were excluded from the amnesty this year.
2004 AMNESTY
PRISONER A received one third cut in sentence. 7 years 3 months 10 days off his sentence, leaving him a total now of 14 years 6 months 20 days to serve.
PRISONER B received one sixth cut in sentence. 6 years 8 months off his sentence, leaving him a total now of 33 years 4 months to serve.
2006 AMNESTY
Has not been confirmed yet!, but the general consensus amongst both prisoners and guards is :
PRISONER A will receive a half cut in his sentence. 7 years 3 months 10 days off his sentence, leaving him a total now of 7 years 3 months 10 days.
Since 1996 until now 2006, he will now be a free man again, with this amnesty and released from prison. Having served a total of 10 years imprisonment of his 50 years original sentence.
PRISONER B will receive a one fifth cut in his sentence. 6 years 8 months off his sentence, leaving him a total now of 26 years 8 months still to serve of his sentence.
HOW CAN THIS BE CALLED JUSTICE?
How can the crimes of having 20 grams of narcotics for personal use, be justifiably more punishable than the evil monsters of such horrendous crimes mentioned in Prisoner A.
And so much more punishable at that, when you compare the end result of 10 years previous amnesty.
EVIL MONSTER WALKS FREE!!
DRUG USER STAYS 26 YEARS 8 MONTHS MORE!
I find myself having to live side by side to many such evil monsters and worse!
Knowing they will be released in less than half the time I have to serve in prison.
By Steve Willcox
HORRENDOUS CRIMES! GET OFF LIGHT
The savagery of the Murder and Rape of 21 year old British Backpacker Katherine Horton in Lamai Beach Koh Samui
A small seaside village, I know only to well, as I lived there for many years.
I feel, I should spell out to the British Public and also the British Government, THE TRUTH behind the punishment of those criminals who are sentenced for the most savage of crimes in
Firstly, I offer my sincere condolences to all the family and friends of Katherine Horton. I have first hand experience of how
I’ am currently serving a 33 ½ year sentence in Bangkwang Prison Nonthaburi
Let’s look at how many amnesties were administered over the last 10 years here in
Comparing what actual reductions in amnesties were given to 2 prisoners. These are based TRUE FACTS!
PRISONER A was convicted and sentenced to 50years imprisonment for a savage Murder and Rape, in fact he could have been convicted and sentenced on any of the following Horrendous crimes:- child molester and killer, serial killer, arsonist. As long as the crime doesn’t involve narcotics, it could be any number of horrendous crimes. All of which would have benefited to the extend I will show in all the last amnesties.
PRISONER B was convicted and sentenced to 50 years imprisonment for possession of 20 grams of narcotics. But because his case involves narcotics, it doesn’t matter how small or large the amount of narcotics.
All narcotics cases are very often excluded altogether from any of the amnesties given, or a fraction of the amnesty that is given to a murderer is given to a narcotic case.
The following amnesties are actual events and are calculated on, both prisoners A and B being of excellent classification (roll model prisoner), and both being sentenced and their cases being closed (finished in 1996).
1996 AMNESTY
PRISONER A would have received a half cut in sentence. 25 years off his sentence, leaving him a total now of 25 years to serve.
PRISONER B would have received one fifth cut in sentence 10 years off his sentence, leaving him a total now of 40 years to serve
1999 AMNESTY
All new murder cases etc. did receive a half cut in sentence this year. But old cases who already received a half cut in amnesty in 1996 only received one sixth.
PRISONER A received one sixth cut in sentence.4 years 2 months off his sentence, leaving him a total now of 21 years 10 months to serve.
PRISONER B this year received no amnesty at all! Because all narcotics cases were excluded from the amnesty this year.
2004 AMNESTY
PRISONER A received one third cut in sentence. 7 years 3 months 10 days off his sentence, leaving him a total now of 14 years 6 months 20 days to serve.
PRISONER B received one sixth cut in sentence. 6 years 8 months off his sentence, leaving him a total now of 33 years 4 months to serve.
2006 AMNESTY
Has not been confirmed yet!, but the general consensus amongst both prisoners and guards is :
PRISONER A will receive a half cut in his sentence. 7 years 3 months 10 days off his sentence, leaving him a total now of 7 years 3 months 10 days.
Since 1996 until now 2006, he will now be a free man again, with this amnesty and released from prison. Having served a total of 10 years imprisonment of his 50 years original sentence.
PRISONER B will receive a one fifth cut in his sentence. 6 years 8 months off his sentence, leaving him a total now of 26 years 8 months still to serve of his sentence.
HOW CAN THIS BE CALLED JUSTICE?
How can the crimes of having 20 grams of narcotics for personal use, be justifiably more punishable than the evil monsters of such horrendous crimes mentioned in Prisoner A.
And so much more punishable at that, when you compare the end result of 10 years previous amnesty.
EVIL MONSTER WALKS FREE!!
DRUG USER STAYS 26 YEARS 8 MONTHS MORE!
I find myself having to live side by side to many such evil monsters and worse!
Knowing they will be released in less than half the time I have to serve in prison.


bravenet.com